Friday, July 11, 2014

A Farewell to the Academy - The Escapism of the Academic Left

When you separate a man from what he loves the most what you do is purge what’s unique in him. And when you purge what’s unique in him, you purge dissent. And when you purge dissent, you kill the revolution. Revolution is dissent. You don’t re-write what I write!
--Jack Reed, as played by Warren Beatty, Reds  


For anyone who’s watched Reds, what Jack Reed loves the most is not his art, or the revolution, or his wife, but the fantasy of the artist, the revolutionary, the lover. He is, to varying degrees, all of those things. But fantasy is about escaping from oneself, becoming something we cannot possibly imagine what it is. What we desire is the feeling of anticipation experienced just before the moment of transformation. The arrival of the promised escape. And we wait, for a sign, for anything really. A harbinger. We’re not sure. And then, one day, we ponder how something that never existed could possibly melt away.

Or so the high school Godot essay goes. It’s a pity we young academics oftentimes intellectualize these themes rather than reflect upon them. But then again, Beckett and, to a far lesser extent, Beatty have lived some shit. What the young academic and their high school selves lack is not intelligence, but experience. What can we know of Beckett when we’re 17? Or 25? Aren’t his condition and themes, for us, more like intellectual toys we play with but think are real? How dangerous is this? Quite, so it seems. We’re in grad school. And won’t stop bitching about it.

Our culture treats knowledge as an unmitigated good. But perhaps it’s still the case that some forms of knowledge are dangerous if held at the wrong time. What do Beckett or Proust or even Hegel impart to us at that tender age beyond the fantasy that we are on the verge of knowing some hidden truths about life and the world? The Beckettian references, the Proustian gestures, the Hegelian dialectics are nothing but accumulated cultural capital and seemingly existential comforts. One should never read Beckett and feel that he’s been mastered. But that’s all the young person can do.

It’s painfully ironic, then, that Godot and works like it have become their own sort of Godot for us: by devoting our lives to these texts and others like them we’ll one day achieve transformative knowledge. The act of reading Godot is the promise of escape.[1] And when transformative knowledge awaits, the gamble of tenure can be easily rationalized.

The life of an academic, just like the life of an activist, is a life of ritual. And ritual, as the anthropologists tell us, opens us up to transformation. In Reds Jack Reed performs all those required of the Marxist activist: the gestures, the meetings, the agitations, the speeches and polemics. Each action is thought to further prepare you for the transformation. It will purify your body and mind, make you ready. Just have faith in the rituals themselves.

Academia, like activism, is no different. It’s a mood, a collection of gestures, objects, and arguments. It’s what you wear. How you talk. The secret language you speak. The dusty book stacks. The tenor of your thoughts. The arguments as they are framed. The very problems that you consider. These all prepare us for transformation.

It would seem, then, that in leaving academia, we’re abandoning this project. That we, like Jack, have watched the fantasy melt away. But I doubt it. A constant gripe among academics in the humanities and social thought is about the stultifying nature of academic writing and argumentative conventions. Liberation from this confinement is an important and prominent theme in much of “quit lit”. But if this is the case, what’s being abandoned is not the fantasy, but the ritual. The ritual, you see, was tarnished. By modernity. By capitalism. By liberalism. It’s time for a new ritual at a new site far away from the academy. Because the academy is now wicked. It’s tainted. Its oracular properties disturbed.

It’s time, then, to found a new religion.





[1] It’s astounding, yet understandable, how so many supposed readers of Nietzsche fall into this trap.

No comments:

Post a Comment